Showing posts with label Christ-mass. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christ-mass. Show all posts

Thursday, March 14, 2013

The World Loves X-mass


Courtesy of A Puritan At Heart
The reformers of the Protestant reformation, rejected Christmas, as popish holy days. Because the holy day was originally introduced when the papists saw it as a way to get more pagans and unbelievers into the church by having this holy day. And isn’t that what many church today, protestant also do? It is the great evangelical outreach of the year; and evangelism has no season for it not being legitimate of course, December no less and no more than any other time. A pastor or minister may feel it is right to preach through the Gospel including that of the birth of Christ in the weeks leading up to this holy day, and there is never not a season for that, but December is no more legitimate than any other part of the year.
The Reformers rejected this holy day, along with that of Easter and all the liturgical calendar. They sought the Scriptures and introduced the Regulative Principle of Worship, which is the very essence of the battle cry of the Reformation of “Sola Scriptura.” The regulative principle of worship is often misunderstood, often by so called scholars of this subject. There are many articles out there on the interent of ministers of Christ writing articles on it, when it is plain that they are writing about something they do not clearly understand. So the inferences they draw, cannot and are not legitimate, because they are drawing them from misunderstanding the principle they are writing about.
The Reformers as I said, rejected these holy days outright, the RPW was one of the main tools, for applying this to our church practices, on how God is to be worshipped. If you substitute the initials RPW for Sola Scriptura, then you will understand that is exactly what it is promoting. And what Reformed believer understanding the battles of the reformation would argue against Sola Scriptura?
The RPW stands and falls on Sola Scriptura. It does not allow in the act of Worship,. Anything which does not have Divine Warrant from God as He has revealed in His holy writ.
The modern Presbyterian church however, has moved into syncretism, even among the conservatives and what would be biblically sound Christians in many ways. Rather than what God warrants, what He commands, what He has ordained for our good and His glory, is put to the side in favour of "what will appeal to the people who come to our church." How can we give them what they want? Isn’t the act of Worship in anyones language to give God what He wants, what He commands, what He desires from us? Aren’t we obligated and isn’t it part of our duty to do so?
The Reformers and puritans were not kill-joys who hated people to have fun. They were not the dour gloomy individuals often portrayed. This aspect of holy days is often used unfairly to promote the fallacy that they were. Charles Dickens’ Ebenezer Scrooge would look happy according to most peoples idea or portrayal of the Reformers and puritans who took this stance, yet that notion is no less fiction than Charles Dickens tale was. The reformers, didn’t dislike fun, they didn’t want children to not enjoy themselves or dislike childish things that children like. Their homes were places where children were nurtured, which if the strict miserable lot often portrayed they would have been terrors unto children. They had no desire to try and undermine God’s plan of redemption for his people(they couldn’t do so even if they had tried!) but they saw that plan of redemption being fulfilled in the way God has given and by His Divine warrant and seal upon, after all, it is HIS plan of redemption The means the Reformers used, to its fullest was by God’s own HOLY DAY, that of each and every Lord’s day, to faithfully preach, teach and exposit the Word of God. The Word of God is what saves people, not fairies or people dressing up in silly red costumes.
We see in Scripture, in Leviticus 10, what happened to the priests who offered their “strange fire” They were immediately consumed in fire. The term strange fire, literally means, “unauthorized fire,” or “unwarranted fire.” Yet they thought they were serving God, well, honourably and to his glory. But God soon showed them what he thought of their strange fire in the wrath that consumed them. But this is not only a Old Testament ordinance it is also a New Testament one that will be dealt with further in the series from the New Testament perspective.
The World loves Christmas, ain’t that the truth? If everyone was as excited about each and every Lord’s Day and was putting as much energy and effort into the Lord’s Day, (God’s only holy day) that is put into this man made holy day, then the church may well have far more evangelical success day to day week to week. But the fact that the world loves this holiday, should cause us to ask ourselves how it can be, that a holy day such as this, with religious significance, can be both equally loved by Christians and the world alike. Is there anything else you can think of with the religious significance of this holiday, that is held is such high esteem equally by both the world and Christians and the Church? Because I sure cannot.
To be continued.

Monday, December 19, 2011

CHRISTMAS AND ROMANS 14:5-6A

BY JOE GARNETT

One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. He that regardeth the day, regardeth it unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard it. Romans 14:5-6a

Proponents of Christmas often appeal to these verses1 to defend their celebration2 of this pagan holy day. At first glance this scripture appears to support their position. But the Bible student should look closer, determining the context and whether this passage can have application to the syncretistic festival of Christmas.

Most commentators teach that Romans 14 deals with Christian liberty. It does, by way of interpretation, only narrowly. By way of interpretation merely two problems are covered, that of whether or not to eat certain meats and whether or not to observe certain days. With regard to Christmas, it is needful that we deal only with the observing of days.

The disputes in this passage take place not because there are simply differences of opinions. The disputes arise because some in the church are weak (immature) and others are strong (mature). This is important to keep in mind because in time one should expect the problem to be solved by the immature becoming mature. (Of course we understand that there might be others coming into the church continually with the same problem, thus protracting the dilemma for some time).

The goal of Biblical instruction is to make the saint a mature person in Jesus Christ (Col. 1:28). Thus in regard to this passage, we need to understand that if all the believers in the church had reached a certain degree of maturity, the problem would not have existed. The solution that Paul gives should be considered a temporary solution for these weak brothers and not a permanent one. (No one would disagree that Christians should always respect and love each other). We should expect these who are now weak to one day become strong as they reside under proper instruction.

The specific problem in verses 5-6a concerns the keeping of days. It appears that the majority of commentators understand the problem to arise from young Jewish converts to the Christian faith. These converts feel obligated to continue to observe Jewish holy days. This should not surprise us for these were proper days for them to observe prior to the work of the Lord Jesus Christ. They have not at this time received the understanding that it is no longer necessary for them to observe these days under the new covenant. We find them in a transition period in which they are confused. If they were to not observe these days they would feel that they were not being obedient to God. They don’t have a grasp on the glorious truth that the work of the Lord Jesus Christ is complete and the days that they observe are only shadows of His fullness (Col. 2:17).

To summarize, I make these observations:
  • The dispute involves different understandings between weak and strong brothers in Christ.
  • The weak feel that they must observe the Jewish holy days as they were previously commanded to do.
  • The strong understand the completed work of Jesus Christ and the new covenant make these days obsolete.
  • These different understandings cause dissension.
  • The only possible solution at this time is for both groups to accept one another in love.
  • In time we should expect the weak to become mature after they have been instructed in the truth and come to an understanding of what Jesus Christ has accomplished.
This is believed to be the interpretation of this passage or its proper understanding. Thus we must expect anyone making application from this passage to keep this understanding in mind at all times.

Continue reading-->HERE.

Monday, November 21, 2011

Christ-Mass Is It Scriptural?


I had been sent to Sunday School as a young child up until about the 3rd grade.  Then my family took up with the Jehovah's Witnesses (egads!) who said that all the holidays were pagan.  Imagine that!

Needless to say, I was quite distressed to learn that I had been lied to!  December 25th was not the birth of Christ Jesus?

As I grew into adulthood, I *celebrated* the *holidays* not for any particular religious reasons, simply for the shear fun and idolatry.  I enjoyed the music, the mood, the secrets, the gifts.

When Father caused me to be born again, I wanted to know what the *holidays* were about, where they came from, and more importantly, what did HE say about them and how did HE want them done.

No where in Scripture could I find any definitive date, nor instruction on celebrating Jesus' birth.  I was shocked!  What?!?! Nor any of the other *holidays* that are commonly thought of as *Christian*.

I have been studying this topic since becoming a Christian (1990).  I have to confess that originally my mission was to discover what *holidays* were outlined in Scripture, how they were celebrated and then *perform* to the standard.  I had a very Pharisee based attitude.

I read the Word, I searched, I studied, I researched, I prayed - a lot.  I found nothing in God's Word indicating that He wanted the birth of HIS son celebrated.  Nothing about Easter, Good Friday, etc. etc. zip, zilch, nada, not one iota.

(As a note, Easter is NOT commanded in the Word...nor is a continuation of the Feasts which Jesus fulfilled.  We are to remember Him by breaking bread as oft as we come together.  Passover, Feast of Unleavened Bread and Feast of First Fruits might be done in remembrance, as long as one does not think they must be done in order to establish and/or secure their salvation or sanctification.)

I had to then grapple with the thought (gag) surely the JW's were not correct?  I staunchly affirm that the Jehovah Witnesses are a cult.  That they have and continue to pervert the Word of God.  That they use 'scare' tactics to keep their 'people' in line. 'Nuff said.

I am including some information that I have gleaned over the years as I researched and studied the issue.  My prayerful request to any reading.  Pray.  Read the Word.  Do not 'stick' with your denominational teachings (on any subject if you can not substantiate it in the Word of God), what you were raised with, or that is what we have always done.

Truly, please pray about the issue, seek HIM and HIS wisdom over the issue.  Praying for the Bride that she will come out out of 'her' and be set apart and holy unto Him.

Is Christmas Christian

10 Reasons Christmas is Unscriptural

The Truth About Christmas, Lent, Good Friday and Easter

Xmas

I browsed through this blog post...it has some interesting information, specifically about Roman Catholicism.

What Is Christ-Mass and Should You Be Merry About It?

God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth. ~ John 4:24