Showing posts with label complementarian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label complementarian. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Studies on the Women of the Bible - Eve


by Davis W. Huckabee

Chapter 1
EVE—THE MOTHER OF ALL LIVING


“And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living,” (Gen. 3:20). This is the first of only four references by name to Eve in Scripture, nor are there many other references to her in Scripture in other ways. Yet she was and is a most important personage, although many people thoroughly misunderstand her role in original sin, and many are quick to attribute all the evil in the world to her instrumen¬tality. But this idea is almost wholly the result of masculine pride, as we will see. This title seems almost contradictory of the facts, for death had been threatened for the eating of the forbidden fruit, (Gen. 2:16-17), which she had been deceived into partaking of by the serpent, (Gen. 3: 1 ff). But now, instead of being known as the Dead One, she is known as the mother of all the living. This will be resolved later.
 The word signifies either living or, the giver or preserver of life. Though for her sin justly sentenced to a present death, yet by God’s infinite mercy, and by virtue of the promised Seed, she was both continued in life herself, and was made the mother of all living men and women that should be after her upon the earth; who though in and with their mother they were condemned to speedy death, yet shall be brought forth into the state and land of the living, and into the hopes of a blessed and eternal life by the Redeemer, whose mother or progenitor she was.—Matthew Poole, Commentary on the Holy Bible, in loco.
As the marginal reading shows, “Eve” translates the Hebrew Chavah from the common Hebrew word chai, to live. For as Adam was the natural head of all mankind, so Eve is the natural mother of all mankind, for from this original pair has come all of mankind that has ever been born since then. This is contrary to the modern theory of evolution, which is, and always has been since its conception, an endeavor to get rid of the problem of God. For God is a tremendous problem to every unconverted person. And they will all generally grasp at any straw, however frail or false or foolish to keep from having to acknowledge that God exists and that they must one day stand before Him and be judged by Him for all their rebellious actions. This is the whole basis of the theory of evolution, for there are no real facts to substantiate it.
However it must be recognized that in their sins there was a radical difference between Adam and Eve. Eve sinned only as an individual, and her sin affected no one but herself, while Adam sinned as the representative and natural head of the whole race, his sin making sinners of all his descendents to the end of time. ‘Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned,” (Rom. 5:12). God had made a covenant with Adam that had to do with all his descendents, and he violated this covenant, as is declared in Hosea 6:7. ‘But they like men (Hebrew Adam) have transgressed the covenant: there have they dealt treacherously against me.” This same truth was spoken in Job 31:33. Here is the only explanation for the curse that befalls every son of Adam in due time.
The Divine record of the Fall is the only possible explanation of the present condition of the human race. It alone accounts for the presence of evil in a world made by a beneficent and perfect Creator. It affords the only adequate explanation for the universality of sin. Why is it that the king’s son in the palace, and the saint’s daughter in the cottage, in spite of every safeguard which human love and watchfulness can devise, manifest from their earliest days an unmistakable bias toward evil and tendency to sin? Why is that sin is universal, that there is no empire, no nation, no family free from this awful disease? Reject the Divine explanation and no satisfactory answer is possible to these questions. Accept it, and we see that sin is universal because all share a common ancestry, all spring from a common stock, “In Adam all die.” The Divine record of the Fall alone explains the mystery of death. Man possesses an imperishable soul, why then should he die? He had breathed into him the breath of the Eternal One, why then should he not live on in this world forever? Reject the Divine explanation and we face an insoluble enigma. Accept it, receive the fact that, “By one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin, and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned” (Rom. 5:12), and we have an explanation which meets all the facts of the case.—A. W. Pink, Gleanings In Genesis, p. 35.
This was the old covenant of works that said, in essence, Behave and you will be blessed, but disobey and you will be under the curse of the broken Law, as in Galatians 3:10. Now no one ever has or ever will keep this covenant so as to be entitled to enter into heaven. Our Lord Himself made this certain when He said in Matthew 19:17 that God alone is good. So, as Scripture says in Proverbs 28:26, he is a fool that trusts in his own heart, for thereby he makes an idol out of his own supposed self-sufficiency. But Eve had no part in this covenant except as any other natural person has because she was taken out of Adam just as every one of us has descended from him. Nor can she be blamed for leading Adam to sin, for as Scripture so clearly shows, he was not deceived by Eve or by Satan, but rather treacherously violated the covenant in full knowledge of all the fearful consequences as he chose sinful Eve to his holy Creator.
 Eve was as much a descendent of Adam as you are. In other words the man, when created, was the whole race in potentiality, and every other human being, including Eve, was derived from him. A very important doctrine will be seen to be dependent upon this when we come to the next chapter, when we come to the fall of man. If Eve was a descendent of Adam, race responsibility did not rest upon her. Her sin might bring death to her, but only to herself, but Adam’s sin would bring it to all to be derived from him. —B. H. Carroll, An Interpretation of the English Bible, Vol. I, p. 84.

Read more-->HERE.
*================================*
NOTE:  This particular paragraph (highlighted text) gives me pause for concern by speculating on what is NOT revealed in the Word of God. Otherwise I find it to be a good overview.

Satan boldly denies the Word of God, for he inserted one of the smallest words in the Hebrew language, but it negated the whole warning “Ye shall NOT surely die.” And then to prove his point, he showed Eve that her assumption was erroneous. “And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food...” How did she see this? Satan probably took a big bite of the forbidden fruit and let the juice run down his chin as he smacked his lips and enjoyed the fruit. And Eve’s erroneous reasoning that the fruit was only forbidden because of its possible deleterious effects on the body convinced her that God was mistaken. We commonly see people reasoning to equally wrong ideas as they endeavor to justify sex outside of marriage. They reason, “Well, in ancient times there was the danger of unwanted pregnancies and disease, so it was forbidden. But now, with modern protection these dangers are greatly alleviated, and so, it is alright to have sex any time and under any circumstances.” But all of God’s prohibitions test the individual whether he will obey God’s Word whether he fully understands it or not. And the possible bad effects are mostly irrelevant to the matter. It is always sin to disobey God’s Word, and there is no justification for it, however reason may suggest otherwise. But Satan’s temptation that worked on Eve, still works today as reason is made to off-set God’s clear commandments.

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Studies on the Women of the Bible - Introduction


by Davis W. Huckabee

Introduction

God has created all things, and we have many of these things detailed for us in the Book of Genesis. But of all the many wonderful and varied things that He has made for the good and convenience and help of man, can anyone think of a greater invention than that of Woman? It is this writer’s humble opinion that the greatest of all God’s inventions is that of the Woman. “And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him,” (Gen. 2:18). And the details of this are given in the verses that follow, which will be considered in due time.

There are many mysteries about the human constitution and by far the majority of these were not even suspected until very recent times, nor has science even come close to exhausting this knowledge in our advanced and technological age. Indeed, much of modem science compounds human ignorance concerning the constitution of man. And this is especially so in regard to the interrelationship of the genders. Too often this ignorance is of the same nature as that of Professor Henry Higgins, who said of Eliza Doolittle, “Why can’t a woman think like a man?” The answer is, Because they are divinely constituted different from one another, even though they have a common origin. Men and women were never meant to be identical in constitution. God purpose­fully made the two genders radically different in several ways.

In regard to the two genders of mankind, some basic truths must be established. First, “man’ as used in the creation account is not a sexist designation, for the proper name Adam and “man” translate the same Hebrew word for a human being without regard to gender. Radical feminists, in their neuroticism, raise their hackles at every mention of the word “man” yet this is the Divine designation for both genders. “So God created man (Hebrew adam) in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them,” (Gen. 1:27). Different Hebrew words such as ishenosh and adam, the most common ones, and other, less common words, describe the human being, depending upon the aspect of the individual being emphasized.

Second, ish is used commonly in regard to the marital relationship of a man to a woman, and the derivation of ‘woman” from this is shown in Genesis. 2:23. “And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman (Hebrew isha ), because she was taken out of Man (Hebrew Ish).” The New Testament gives a commentary on this in 1 Corinthians 11:8-12. “For the man is not of the woman; but the woman is of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man. For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels. Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord.” Verse 10 relates to the length of the hair in each case as was established immediately before this, (vv. 3-7), and it is this that is given in place of a veil, as shown in verse 15, where the common word for substitution (Greek anti) is used. This is the same Greek word used in Matthew 20:28 of the Lord’s substitutionary death for His people. Will anyone dare say that His death was not sufficient, but that man must add something, as some say that an artificial covering must be added to the woman’s hair?

Nor was she called Woman because, as one bitter man observed, she would henceforth be a Woe to the man. Granted, some women fall into this class, but probably a lot oftener the man is a curse to the unfortunate woman that marries him more than she is to him. Creation of the first woman was an act of great goodness toward the man, as we read in verse 18, for God has committed Himself to make it so that marriage to a fitting woman obtains the favor of God, as we are told in Proverbs 18:22. “Whoso findeth a wife findeth a good thing, and obtaineth favor of the Lord.”

Read more -->HERE.

Friday, November 25, 2011

Complementarian or Evangelical Feminism?

Book Review:  Men and Women Equal Yet Different - Alexander Strauch

A brief study of the Biblical passages on gender.  Opens with a statement of purpose:
One of the most significant changes in human history has occurred during the past forty years. It is the gender revolution. In the words of historian William Manchester, "the erasure of distinctions between the sexes is not only the most striking issue of our time, it may be the most profound the race has ever confronted."
Like the rest of society, Christianity has been permanently affected by this change.  According to a leading Time magazine article entitled "The Second Reformation," religious feminists "believe they are caught up in one of Christendom's great and historic transformations." In reality, the gender transformation taking place within the worldwide Christian community is not a sign of a "second reformation" (the first being Martin Luther's back-to-the-Bible, sixteenth-century reformation) but of a radical departure from biblical, apostolic Christianity.
Among Bible-believing Christians, the gender revolution has spawned intense, emotional controversy over what the Bible says about the roles of men and women. There are two major viewpoints in this debate. One is the evangelical feminist view (or egalitarian view); the other is the complementarian view, which is the non-feminist view.
The purpose of this book is to state and defend the complementarian viewpoint.  Written in outline form, the book presents biblical evidence that Jesus Christ taught that men and women are equal yet different. It introduces the key terms, arguments, and the most recent research related to the complementarian position. Thus is also provides an easy-to-read summary of all the key Scripture passages commonly used in the gender debate.
Ninety percent of this book consists of Scripture exposition. I emphasize the Scriptures because the answer to this debate is found in God's Word, not in books on sociology or anthropology.  Furthermore, "no factor is more influential in shaping a [Christian's] moral and social behavior than regular Bible reading." Yet biblical illiteracy abounds in alarming proportions among Christians today, and one well-known authority predicts an even greater decline in Bible reading. As the voices of postmodern secular society grown louder and more appealing, it is essential that Christians hear clearly the voice of God through the Word of God in order to counteract secular society's pervasive influence.
I sincerely pray that you will find the careful exposition of Holy Scripture to be the most rewarding part of this book. The study of God's Word should always be exciting for a Christian. Our Lord loved the Word of God and quoted it with full authority when He faced trials and controversy. As one biblical scholar says of Jesus, our Lord.
"We can say with all reverence that Jesus Christ was practically saturated with the Scriptures...One tenth of His words wee taken from the Old Testament. In the Four Gospels 180 of 1800 verses which report His discourses are either quotations of the written revelation or else direct allusions to it. If we are criticized for constantly quoting Scripture texts, what can be said of Christ, who had them constantly at the tip of His tongue?
This book is written for people who are unfamiliar with the biblical passages on gender and probably will not read a lengthy technical book on the subject (of which there are a bewildering number of choices). It is especially suitable for high school- and college-age young people. It is also an excellent resource for anyone who wants an overview of all the key biblical passages related to the gender debate from the complementarian position.
As to the spiritual identity of my readers, I take for granted that they accept the lordship of Jesus Christ over their lives and believe the Bible to be the written Word of God and the Christian's divine, unerring authority for doctrine and life. As the Bible says of itself,
All Scripture is inspired by God [literally, God-breathed] and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work (2 Tim. 3:16, 17).
I felt that it was important to share that...it is vital for our families that we have a clear, Biblical understanding of how Father intended the marriage relationship to function. I am going to list the chapter titles and sub-chapter headings.

  • Understanding the Controversy
    • Complementarian View
    • Evangelical Feminist View
    • Jesus Christ and Gender Discrimination
    • A Plea

  • I. Jesus Christ Appealed To The Creation Account
    • A. Genesis 1: Created Equal in God's Image
      • 1. God created the human race male and female.
      • 2. God created both the man and the woman in His image.
      • 3. God commanded both the man and the woman to multiply and rule the earth.
      • 4. God name the human race "man."
    • B. Genesis 2: Created Equal and Different
      • 1. God made Adam the central character.
      • 2. God created Adam first.
      • 3. God formed the woman out of the man.
      • 4. God created the woman for the man.
      • 5. God gave the man the right to name the woman.
      • 6. God created the man and woman equal in nature.
    • C. Genesis 3: The Fall and the Battle of the Sexes
      • 1. Eve's deception.
      • 2. Eve's penalty.
      • 3. Adam's penalty.

  • II. Jesus Christ Appointed Male Leadership for His Church
    • A. Jesus Had to Be a Man
    • B. Jesus Appointed Twelve Male Apostles
      • 1. Jesus was fearless.
      • 2. Jesus was a non-traditionalist.
      • 3. Jesus didn't fail women.

  • III. Through His Apostles, Jesus Christ Gave Instruction on Marriage
    • A. 1 Peter 3:1-7: Submission and Understanding
      • 1. Peter instructs Christian wives to submit to their husbands.
        • a. The meaning of submission (hypotasso)
        • b. The inner beauty of a submissive spirit
        • c. Limits on submission
      • 2. Peter supports submission with the Old Testament Scriptures.
      • 3. Peter instructs Christian husbands to understand and honor their wives.
        • a. Be an understanding husband
        • b. Show honor to your wife
          • (1) Weaker vessel.
          • (2) Equals in spiritual life.
          • (3) Divine discipline.
    • B. Ephesians 5:21-33; Submission, Loving Headship, and a One-Flesh Union
      • 1. Paul instructs wives to submit to their husbands.
        • a. Submit as to the Lord
        • b. A profound theological reason for submission
          • (1) The husband is the head.
          • (2) The husband's headship is based on Christ's headship.
        • c. The wife's submission is based on the Church's submission
      • 2. Paul instructs husbands to love their wives as Christ loved the Church.
        • a. Loving one's wife as Christ loves the Church
        • b. Loving one's wife as one's own body
          • (1) Husband and wife are one body, one flesh, one person.
          • (2) Christ and His people are one Body.
          • (3) A great mystery.
    • C. Colossians 3:18, 19: Submission and Love
    • D. 1 Corinthians 7:1-40: Divorce, Singleness, and Marital Obligations
    • E. Titus 2:3-5: Teaching Younger Wives Love and Submission.
      • 1. Love your husband.
      • 2. Love your children.
      • 3. Be a diligent homemaker.
      • 4. Be submissive to your husband.
    • F. 1 Timothy 3:4,5, 12: Men as Good Family Leaders

  • IV. Through His Apostles, Jesus Christ Taught Gender Equality and Role Differences in the Christian Community
    • A. 1 Timothy 2:8-15: Submission and Leadership in the Church Family
      • 1. Men's prayers.
      • 2. Women's dress.
      • 3. Women's submission.
        • a. Learning
        • b. Teaching
        • c. Exercising authority
        • d. Biblical reasons
          • (1) Adam was created first.
          • (2) Adam was not deceived, Eve was.
    • B. 1 Corinthians 14:33b-40: Submission in the Church Meetings
      • 1. The Law and Christianity agree on submission.
      • 2. Universal church practice agrees with submission.
    • C. 1 Corinthians 11:2-16: Headship, Submission and Glory
      • 1. Three headship-subordination relationships.
        • a. Christ/Man
        • b. Man/Woman
        • c. God/Christ
      • 2. The original order of creation.
        • a. Man is the image and glory of God
        • b. Woman is the glory of the man
          • (1) Woman from the man.
          • (2) Woman for the man.
          • (c) The interdependence of man and woman
    • D. Romans 16:1-16; Acts 16:14, 15, 18:24-26; Philippians 4:2, 3; 1 Timothy 3:11: Ministering Women
      • 1. Romans 16:1-16.
        • a. Phoebe
        • b. Prisca (Priscilla)
        • c. Mary
        • d. Junias
        • e. Tryphaena, Tryphosa, Persis, Rufus's mother
      • 2. Acts 16:14, 15; Philippians 4:2, 3: Lydia, Euodia, and Syntyche.
      • 3. Acts 18:24-26: Priscilla, Aquila, and Apollos.
      • 4. First Timothy 3:11: Women as deacons.
    • E. Galatians 3:28: Oneness with Christ
      • 1. The Meaning of Galatians 3:28.
      • 2. The Misuse of Galatians 3:28.
      • 3. The Implications of Galatians 3:28.

  • V. Jesus Christ and His Apostles Spoke Plainly
    • A. We Allow Jesus to Speak and Act for Himself
    • B. We Allow the Whole of Scripture to Speak for Itself
    • C. We Allow the Plain Sense of Scripture to Speak for Itself
    • D. We Allow the Core Passages to Speak for Themselves

  • VI. Take Courage and Stand Strong In Your Faith
Being raised in a society pulsating with feminist ideology makes for an intriguing path in understanding and embracing God's design for male and female.  While not easy, it is an obtainable goal.

A few quotes from the book:

Alexander Strauch:  "...in Ephesians 5, the husband is commanded to love his wife --not to rule her, boss her, control her, break her, or enslave her." 

He quoted Mary Kassian:
"Teaching on marital roles has often been lopsided.  Many preach on woman's submission without allotting equal time to man's corresponding responsibilities. This is a source of endless frustration to women. They constantly hear how they are to submit, yet they seldom hear that this is tempered by the husband's responsibility to love.
As a result, some women have rebelled against biblical teaching. As well, the overemphasis on the woman's role has led men to believe that it is their duty as spiritual leaders to help their wives learn submission. This belief fosters a harsh, domineering, and chauvinistic attitude that makes it even more difficult for women to fulfill their role.  Much bitterness and rebellion could be avoided if the emphasis on marital roles were correctly placed on the male role of loving leadership rather than on the female role of submission."

May God grant male and female to embrace His design, to walk in His love and mercy, obedience and submission to His calling and equipping us.  May we reclaim that which God has given us and boldly encourage others to do the same.